Someone walks into the office. They've done years of cognitive-behavioral therapy, taken antidepressants, read the self-help books, tried meditating with apps on their phone. None of it was useless. But something is still missing. Something without a clinical name, something the conventional tools brush against but never quite touch.
That feeling of incompleteness isn't a failure of the patient or a failure of psychology. It's a signal. An invitation to look beyond the frameworks we were taught in graduate school, beyond diagnosis and protocol, toward a dimension of human experience that Western science is only beginning to take seriously, but that contemplative traditions have explored for millennia.
That gaze has a name: transpersonal psychology. It's not an alternative to psychology; it's its natural expansion. And in this article, I want to explain what it is, why contemporary neuroscience increasingly supports it, and what it looks like when it stops being theory and becomes lived experience.
The fourth force: when psychology dares to look beyond
To understand transpersonal psychology, you first need to understand what made it necessary. The twentieth century gave us three great waves in psychology: behaviorism, which studied the observable; psychoanalysis, which explored the unconscious; and humanistic psychology, from Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers, which placed the whole human being at the center.
But Maslow, even after revolutionizing psychology with his hierarchy of needs and the concept of self-actualization, felt something was missing. In his later years, he wrote about "peak experiences" that his healthiest patients reported: moments of deep connection, of the ordinary sense of self dissolving, of contact with something that words can barely hold. Experiences that fit in no diagnostic manual, yet transformed lives.
The formal beginning: In 1969, Maslow and Anthony Sutich founded the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, followed by the Association for Transpersonal Psychology in 1972. Czech psychiatrist Stanislav Grof, who had extensively researched non-ordinary states of consciousness, became one of the movement's theoretical pillars. Maslow called this new current the "fourth force" of psychology (Grof, 2008).
What these pioneers proposed was not to abandon rigor. It was to widen the map. If humanistic psychology said "the human being is more than their pathologies," transpersonal psychology added: "and also more than their ordinary personality." There are dimensions of human experience, states of consciousness, forms of knowing and healing, that operate beyond the ego, and they deserve the same seriousness we dedicate to anxiety or depression.
Beyond the ego doesn't mean against the ego
This is where many people get confused, and understandably so. When they hear "transpersonal" or "beyond the ego," they imagine something ethereal, vague, incompatible with rigor. They think of crystals, questionable gurus, promises of instant enlightenment. But serious transpersonal psychology is the exact opposite of that.
Philosopher and psychologist Ken Wilber articulated this distinction with a clarity that remains essential: there is an enormous difference between the prepersonal (before the ego forms), the personal (the healthy, functional ego), and the transpersonal (what emerges when a mature ego can relax its boundaries). Confusing the prepersonal with the transpersonal is what Wilber calls the "pre/trans fallacy," and it's the mistake made both by skeptics who dismiss everything spiritual as pseudoscience and by seekers who confuse regression with transcendence.
The contemplative traditions always knew this. Zen Buddhism doesn't seek to destroy the self; it seeks for you to see it so clearly that it stops trapping you. Sufi mysticism doesn't deny reason; it moves through reason until it finds what reason alone cannot reach. Transpersonal psychology, at its best, takes up that same wisdom and translates it into a language that contemporary science can begin to verify.
This point is crucial, and at Dynamis we live it as an operating principle: you cannot transcend what you haven't built. This is why our integrative work begins with depth psychology tools, with the Enneagram as a map of character structure, with logotherapy and existential analysis. First we build a healthy, conscious ego. Only then does it make sense to invite the person to explore what exists beyond it.
What neuroscience is confirming
For decades, transpersonal phenomena were dismissed by science as subjective anecdotes or psychiatric symptoms. That changed dramatically over the past twenty years.
The evidence is growing: Roland Griffiths' team at Johns Hopkins demonstrated that psilocybin experiences in controlled settings produce mystical experiences that participants rate as "among the most meaningful of their lives," with sustained positive effects on well-being, openness, and existential anxiety reduction measured up to 14 months later (Griffiths et al., 2006, 2008). Robin Carhart-Harris at Imperial College London showed that these experiences correlate with decreased activity in the default mode network (DMN), the brain circuit associated with the ordinary sense of self, suggesting a measurable neurological correlate for the "ego dissolution" that contemplative traditions have described for centuries (Carhart-Harris et al., 2012). In parallel, Richard Davidson and his team at the University of Wisconsin have documented structural and functional changes in the brains of experienced meditators, including greater gray matter density, enhanced connectivity, and unprecedented gamma wave activity patterns (Davidson & Lutz, 2008).
I want to be precise here, because honesty is part of the transpersonal work: neuroscience doesn't "prove" the existence of the spiritual. What it does is confirm that expanded states of consciousness are real, measurable, and therapeutically significant. Something happens in the brain, in the body, and in the subjective experience of people who access these states, and that something produces lasting, positive change.
Science is validating what contemplative traditions always knew. This isn't about one being right and the other wrong. It's about both looking at the same mountain from different sides.
How transpersonal psychology lives in practice
Everything above might sound theoretical. But transpersonal psychology, when truly practiced, doesn't live in books. It lives in the body that trembles during a conscious breathing session and releases something it had been holding for years. It lives in the silence of a meditation where, for an instant, you stop being "you" with your problems and recognize yourself as something vaster. It lives in ceremony, where the professional framework and ancestral wisdom meet to hold a process that talk therapy alone could not contain.
In practice, a transpersonal approach doesn't discard conventional tools; it includes them and expands them. You might work with your therapist on an anxiety pattern using cognitive techniques and, within the same process, explore what that anxiety tells you about your relationship with control, with trust, with the mystery of not knowing what comes next. The difference isn't in the tools; it's in the breadth of the map you're working with.
The integrative approach at Dynamis combines logotherapy (Viktor Frankl's search for meaning), Jungian psychology (shadow work and archetypes), the Enneagram as a map for deep self-knowledge, ceremonial work within a professional framework, and the dry tropical forest as co-therapist. This isn't eclecticism: it's integration with a clear backbone, where each tool has its place and its moment.
And something fundamental: you don't need to be "spiritual" to benefit from this approach. You don't need to believe in anything. You need openness. You need willingness to explore dimensions of your experience that perhaps no one ever invited you to look at. The transpersonal isn't adopted as dogma; it's discovered as direct experience.
The bridge that was missing
We live in a cultural moment where scientific materialism and new age spirituality seem to be the only options available. Either you reduce everything to neurochemistry, or you turn everything into "energy" and "vibrations." Both extremes impoverish the human experience.
Transpersonal psychology offers a third way. A bridge where clinical evidence and ancestral wisdom don't compete but enrich each other. Where you can talk about neuroplasticity and ceremony in the same conversation without either losing rigor or depth. Where your healing process doesn't have to choose between science and soul, because they were never separate.
"The psychology of the future will not be merely a science of the brain, nor merely a science of behavior. It will be a science of consciousness in all its dimensions, including those our current frameworks are only beginning to comprehend." — Stanislav Grof
This bridge doesn't exist only as a concept. It exists as a physical space: a dry tropical forest in Guanacaste, Costa Rica, where the trees shed their leaves in the dry season and are reborn with the rains, reminding us that transformation always means letting go before flowering. It exists as practice: in the careful integration of depth psychology, ceremonial work, conscious breathing, and the silence needed for something new to emerge.
If you sense that your search needs more space than the conventional office offers, if you intuit that healing includes dimensions you haven't yet explored, you don't need to believe in anything new. You only need to allow yourself the question: what if there's more?
That question is the first step on the transpersonal path. And it's exactly where the work begins.
Explore our integrative retreats →
Frequently asked questions
Is transpersonal psychology pseudoscience?
No. Transpersonal psychology has been a formally recognized current since 1969, with its own academic publications such as the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology and the International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. Researchers at institutions including Johns Hopkins, Imperial College London, and the University of Wisconsin have produced rigorous evidence on the phenomena it studies. Not everything in the transpersonal field has the same level of evidence, as is the case in any branch of psychology, but its theoretical core and many of its practices have growing scientific support.
Do I need to be spiritual to benefit from this approach?
No. Transpersonal psychology doesn't require prior beliefs of any kind. It works with direct experience, not dogma. Many people who approach this framework identify as agnostic or skeptical, and find value in exploring dimensions of their experience, such as meaning, connection with nature, and deep states of consciousness, without subscribing to any specific spiritual tradition.
How is transpersonal psychology different from humanistic psychology?
Humanistic psychology centers on the individual's self-actualization and their growth potential. Transpersonal psychology includes all of that and also explores what happens when the ordinary sense of self expands: peak experiences, contemplative states, the dimension of meaning and transcendence. Abraham Maslow, who founded both, described the transpersonal as the natural evolution of the humanistic.
What kind of professional practices transpersonal psychology?
A transpersonal therapist is, first and foremost, a mental health professional (psychologist, psychiatrist, or psychotherapist) with additional training in integrative approaches that include the spiritual and contemplative dimension. At Dynamis, the work is guided by psychologists trained in logotherapy, Jungian psychology, the Enneagram, and ceremonial facilitation, always within a professional and ethical framework.
Can I combine transpersonal therapy with my current psychological treatment?
Yes, and in many cases it's ideal. Transpersonal psychology doesn't replace other approaches; it complements them. If you're in cognitive-behavioral, psychoanalytic, or pharmacological treatment, transpersonal work can offer an additional dimension that enriches your process. What matters is that communication exists between the professionals involved and that any treatment decisions are made with full information.
References:
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Erritzoe, D., Williams, T., Stone, J. M., Reed, L. J., Colasanti, A., ... & Nutt, D. J. (2012). Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(6), 2138-2143.
Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2008). Buddha's brain: Neuroplasticity and meditation. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25(1), 176-174.
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187(3), 268-283.
Grof, S. (2008). Brief history of transpersonal psychology. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 27(1), 46-54.
